Justice for All

Put an End to Unequal Access to Justice

Nobody would argue that the right to a fair trial is one of the most important human rights. And almost everyone who has experienced the resolution of legal disputes in real life knows how far the modern judicial system is from being ideal.

There are several reasons for this, and let's start with the obvious. People are the ones who act as judges, and they are susceptible to incompetence, political bias, external pressure, corruption, and personal preferences. But even in the most impartial and competent court, the party with fewer financial resources is already at a disadvantage. The wealthier party can afford to spend on expensive lawyers who can tilt the scales in their favor or at least "drag out" the case.

Unfortunately, over time, the situation is not improving but rather deteriorating. Access to fair justice becomes increasingly limited. We all know that jurisprudence is one of the most conservative fields. Becoming a lawyer is not easy, and becoming a judge is even more challenging. Should we be surprised that this field is struggling to keep up with the challenges of the times?

Here are just a couple of the challenges it faces:

• The complexity of life keeps increasing, leading to a rise in the number of transactions, which in turn leads to more disputes and conflicts. The disputes themselves are also becoming more intricate. As a result, courts today are overwhelmed, and proceedings often last for years, with decisions being made when they are no longer relevant.
• Globalization has made cross-border transactions commonplace. However, along with that, there has been a rapid increase in the complexity of resolving conflicts that arise during these transactions. There is a significant shortage of individuals capable of understanding the laws of different countries, international law, as well as the conflicts between various legal systems and "legal loopholes."

Therefore, it's not surprising that in our modern era, comprehensive contracts are increasingly being replaced by substitutes such as public offers and formal user agreements. We witness the consequences of this in practical terms.

Let's take a look at the internet as an example. It's like the Middle Ages in there. Regular users are powerless creatures, forced to use any service "as is." The decisions made by service administrators are opaque. A user can never be certain that the information collected about them won't be turned against them. The administration can arbitrarily restrict users' rights and even completely prohibit them from accessing the service without the right to appeal. It's astonishing, but people have grown accustomed to this state of affairs and see no way out. More and more individuals are giving up on defending their rights, even when confronted with blatant injustice. So it wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that the legal system, which has been improving over the centuries to best protect the interests of society as a whole, now works against it.

But just imagine if a judge emerged – impartial and untainted, well-versed in the intricacies of legislation from any country and international law, rendering decisions in a near-instantaneous manner. But here's the most important part – this judge's task isn't just or primarily about "punishing the guilty," but rather to help each party present their position as effectively and comprehensively as possible, thereby embodying the principle of ultimate justice.

The proposed online service caters to a wide range of users, including entrepreneurs, individuals, particularly those engaged in cross-border transactions, as well as internet services whose terms of use include arbitration between users. Ideally, we aspire to a point where public pressure compels all major internet services to adopt the "digital judge" for resolving conflicts between their administrators and users.

How Will It Help People?

The Service is designed to be utilized in three fundamental scenarios:

1. When both parties have agreed beforehand to arbitration through the Service, such as by including it in a contract. In this instance, the Service functions as an arbitrator. It examines the case, evaluates the credibility of the evidence, and, whenever possible, gathers additional evidence from various sources, using the Your Personal Intelligence Service as a foundation. The Service assumes the role of not just a "strict judge" but also an advocate, suggesting to each party what other evidence they could provide to bolster their position.
2. If one of the parties rejects arbitration or if conducting arbitration is unfeasible for objective reasons. In this case, the Service acts as a lawyer defending your interests, and to some extent, even a private detective. It provides the user with comprehensive legal support for their case, helping them strengthen their position and find weaknesses in the opponent's position. When possible, it also gathers additional evidence.
3. When there is a necessity to anticipate the legal consequences of a transaction or a particular decision, or to receive legal assistance in a transaction. In this scenario, the Service functions as a legal consultant, assisting the user in accurately assessing the legal risks associated with their actions and providing advice on how to mitigate these risks.

Can Machines Replace Humans?

But wait, skeptics may say, how can machines replace humans in such a complex field? After all, we're accustomed to the idea that being a lawyer is a very complex, highly paid, and prestigious profession, and judges are almost like demigods. Are you suggesting that we replace all of this with a tiny piece of silicon smaller than a square inch?

We believe that recent advancements in AI technology give us hope that machines can indeed compete with humans in this field. We're not going to engage in long and tedious discussions about how the complexity of the legal framework has long exceeded the capabilities of an ordinary person. Nor are we going to mention that life (and therefore laws) are changing at such a rapid pace today that very few individuals can keep up with it.

Let's set aside philosophical debates and reason simply. If a case is clear-cut and only requires legal documentation to confirm one side's victory, even a relatively "simple-minded" machine can handle it. And in truly complex and intricate cases, even if the machine were to make decisions by flipping a coin, each side would still have a 50% chance of winning. However, in reality, the victor in complex matters is often not the one who is right, but the one with more financial resources, influential connections, or time.

The same applies to using a machine as an attorney. No matter how "simple-minded" a machine may be, it can undoubtedly be helpful in straightforward cases. In complex cases, at the very least, it won't have the motivation to unnecessarily prolong proceedings to extract more money from the client.

Furthermore, we must recognize that technological progress is continuously making machines increasingly intelligent. Therefore, there is no doubt that the decisions made by machines will be far superior to a mere "coin flip."

On the Issue of Trust

Well, skeptics continue to ask, what about the issue of trust in such a "judge"? Who guarantees that the Service won't be manipulated by its owners and that it won't ultimately become a tool for imposing favorable decisions on someone? While the judicial system may have its flaws, at least it has some level of reputation. Over the years, methods of control have been established, albeit imperfect ones. But how will the machine be controlled, and by whom? Could this well-intentioned initiative lead to even greater harm, as often happens?

Yes, we understand and share these concerns.

We propose a solution through the implementation of the concept of "Open Services." The core idea is that all online services (and technologies in a broader sense) that hold significant social value should be placed under the full and direct control of their users. Throughout human history, direct democracy has proven to be the best way to protect against abuses in any field. Ultimately, the people are always right, and it is the people who should determine the direction of technological development and how these technologies are used.

Unfortunately, the current trend in technology is the opposite, with control concentrated in the hands of investors, corporate management, and government officials, rather than the users themselves. In the past, when technology didn't play such a prominent role in our lives, we may have accepted this situation. However, with the growing discussions about machines potentially replacing humans in various aspects of life, even potentially enslaving them, it is time to change the rules of the game.

One of the main objectives of this project is to demonstrate in practice that the concept of Open Services is effective, setting new trends in technological development.

How Can You Support Us?

We are reaching out to:

• Everyone who wants to make the justice system and our lives fairer.
• Those involved in legal matters seeking advanced tools for their work.
• Representatives of companies interested in freely using the developments we have made in their own projects.
• And to all those who understand the vital importance of democratizing the field of technology.

The realization of such complex projects relies on widespread support. Therefore, our first step is to raise awareness among as many people as possible about our ideas. Share information about the project with your friends and acquaintances. Publish it on your platforms or in communities you belong to. Help us catch the attention of influential figures. Translate the information into other languages.

If you possess skills that can contribute to the project's implementation, join our team. Share your knowledge and experience with us.

And, of course, provide financial support for the project. It currently exists as an idea, and there is an immense amount of work ahead. Remember, great things begin with small steps. Every dollar we collect brings us closer to turning this idea into reality. Let's show everyone that together we are a force capable of accumulating significant resources to solve serious problems, and let's gather an amount sufficient to give a confident start to the project.

Take action now and be a part of the project's foundation, making our lives more free and just together!